3 weeks ago
The Ghana Union Movement (GUM), led by Christian Kwabena Andrews, also known as Osofo Kyiri Abosom, has proposed a substantial reduction in the number of Members of Parliament (MPs) in Ghana from the current 275 to around 40. This ambitious plan, unveiled during a press conference in Accra, aims to streamline the legislative process, cut costs, and improve efficiency within the country’s governance system.
GUM’s plan argues that Ghana’s Parliament has grown too large for a country of its size, resulting in excessive administrative expenses that strain public resources. According to Andrews, each MP adds to the financial burden with salaries, benefits, and logistical expenses—resources that could be redirected toward urgent development needs. By reducing the number of MPs, GUM believes Ghana can ease these pressures on the budget, making way for funds to be allocated to sectors like education, healthcare, and infrastructure.
Beyond cost savings, GUM contends that fewer MPs would foster a more efficient legislative process. The party argues that the current size of Parliament often results in prolonged debates, legislative gridlock, and delays in decision-making. By reducing the assembly, GUM envisions a more streamlined, less partisan environment where policy decisions are made swiftly and in alignment with national interests rather than party agendas.
This proposal aligns with GUM’s broader vision for a government modeled on the values of Ghana’s first president, Dr. Kwame Nkrumah. Established in 2019, GUM advocates for policies grounded in economic independence and social welfare. In the 2020 general election, the party gained significant public attention, securing over 100,000 votes in the presidential race—a notable achievement for a new political movement. This latest proposal to reform Parliament is an extension of GUM’s mission to challenge conventional governance structures and promote changes they believe will benefit the Ghanaian people.
With Ghana’s political landscape traditionally dominated by the New Patriotic Party (NPP) and National Democratic Congress (NDC), GUM’s call for reform introduces a fresh perspective. While this proposal may face resistance within established political circles, it is resonating with segments of the public concerned with high government expenditures and inefficiency in the legislative process.
As Ghana heads into another election cycle, the question of parliamentary reform has become a topic of lively debate, with GUM pushing the national conversation toward a leaner, more accountable government structure.
Total Comments: 0