See Suspended Chief Justice Torkornoo’s Response to Her Accusers – And Why It Left Me Thinking
A few years ago, I found myself in the middle of a workplace drama I didn’t ask for. Someone accused me of saying something I didn’t even remember saying. It was one of those moments where you just sit there wondering, “Wait… what?” I tried to stay calm and defend myself, but no matter how clearly I spoke, it felt like the damage was already done. People had made up their minds.
So when I saw the headline—“See suspended Chief Justice Torkornoo’s response to each of her accusers”—that old memory came rushing back.
Because here’s the thing: once you’re accused publicly, even if you’re innocent, it’s like trying to clean oil off white linen. Nearly impossible. And for someone like Justice Gertrude Torkornoo, a woman who’s sat at the very top of Ghana’s judiciary, the weight of those accusations must be suffocating.
Now, I read through her responses. Carefully. Slowly. Even re-read a few parts because honestly, I wasn’t sure what to expect. I thought maybe she’d go silent or say the usual PR lines, but nope—she addressed each accusation head-on. Calm. Clear. No dramatic speeches. No finger-pointing. Just… facts.
That’s rare. Especially in Ghana’s public space where people either shout louder than their critics or vanish into the background until the noise fades.
She tackled the claims of bias. She denied the allegations about financial misconduct. She even called out what she believed were misrepresentations of her decisions. It wasn’t defensive—it was measured. Almost like she knew people were watching not just what she said, but how she said it.
And to be fair, in this social media era, perception can be louder than truth. I mean, you scroll through Twitter (sorry, X) and people already have her convicted in the court of public opinion. Memes. Hashtags. Voice notes flying around like wildfire.
But here’s what struck me—whether you believe her or not, she’s reminding us that the accused also deserve a voice. And not just a voice—a fair hearing.
I might be wrong, but I’ve noticed that when women in power are accused, the reactions feel sharper. More personal. Like the fall from grace is more satisfying to watch. And maybe that’s why Justice Torkornoo’s calm, detailed responses matter even more.
Still, I get it. People are angry. They want accountability in the justice system. They want to believe that even the highest office isn’t above scrutiny. That’s fair. Necessary, even. But it also raises a tricky question:
Can we hold leaders accountable without dragging them through the mud before they’ve had a chance to explain?
I know our politics is messy. Trust is low. Everyone’s suspicious of everyone. But if we toss due process out the window just to satisfy public anger, what are we left with?
So yeah… as I closed the tab and sipped the now-cold tea I forgot about while reading her statements, I kept thinking: What if she’s telling the truth?
And more importantly—what if next time, it’s you or me facing accusations without a mic or camera to tell our side?
blogpay
Total Comments: 0