South Africas top court on Thursday upheld an earlier ruling that former president Jacob Zuma should return to prison to complete his 15-month term for contempt of court, dismissing an appeal seeking to keep him out of jail.
It was not immediately clear whether Zuma would return to jail, with prison authorities saying they were studying the judgment and seeking legal advice.
Zuma was sentenced in June 2021 after refusing to testify before a panel probing financial sleaze and cronyism under his presidency. He was freed on medical parole just two months into his term.
He started serving his sentence in July.
His jailing sparked riots that descended into looting and left more than 350 dead. This was the most terrifying violence to hit the country since democracy arrived in South Africa.
The following month, he was admitted to a hospital for an undisclosed condition before receiving medical parole.
In November last year, an appeals court found the release improper and ordered the now-81-year-old back to the Estcourt Correctional Center in the eastern KwaZulu-Natal province.
South Africas prison service, which granted Zumas conditional release, appealed the decision, but the bid was dismissed by the Constitutional Court.
It ruled on Thursday that it had no reasonable prospects of success and ordered the prison services and Zuma, an intervening applicant, to pay legal costs.
The prison services declared in October last year that Zuma had officially ended his sentence and was released from their system. But in November, the appeals court described the decision as "premature".
On Thursday, the prison services said they were studying the Constitutional Court Judgment for the review application regarding the medical parole placement for the former President.
They added in a statement that they were seeking legal advice and will comment further in due course. Zumas spokesman, Mzwanele Manyi, referred comment requests to prison authorities.
South Africas leading opposition party, the Democratic Alliance, described the latest ruling as a victory for the rule of law.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0