Controversy over GH?150 Deductions for CPD points in Teachers' a
Allowance by GES.
Introduction:
A recent controversy has erupted on social media platforms regarding alleged deductions of GH?150 from teachers' professional allowances for Continuous Professional Development (CPD) points by the Ghana Education Service (GES). This issue has drawn widespread attention and sparked intense discussions among teachers, education stakeholders, and the general public. Let's delve into the details and understand the different perspectives surrounding this contentious matter.
The Alleged Deductions:
According to claims circulating on social media, the GES has started deducting GH?150 from teachers' professional allowances as a penalty for failing to accumulate the required CPD points. CPD is an essential component of professional development for teachers, aimed at enhancing their skills and knowledge in their respective fields. However, the alleged deductions have raised concerns and triggered a debate on the fairness and transparency of the process.
The Teachers' Perspective:
Many teachers have expressed their dissatisfaction with the alleged deductions, arguing that they were not adequately informed about the penalties and the criteria for CPD point accumulation. Some have also raised concerns about the timing of these deductions, as they believe it is unfair to penalize teachers during a time of economic hardship and uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Teachers are calling for more clarity and transparency in the CPD point system and the deduction process.
The GES's Stance:
The GES has not issued an official statement regarding the alleged deductions. However, some education officials have defended the deductions, stating that they are necessary to incentivize teachers to actively engage in CPD activities and continually improve their teaching skills. They argue that these penalties serve as a motivation for teachers to stay updated with the latest pedagogical practices and contribute to the overall quality of education in the country.
Public Reaction and Social Media Controversy:
The social media controversy surrounding the alleged deductions has gained significant traction, with many individuals expressing their opinions on various online platforms. Some social media users have criticized the GES, questioning the transparency and fairness of the deduction process. Others have shown support for the deductions, believing that they encourage teachers to invest in their professional development.
The Way Forward:
In light of the growing controversy, it is crucial for the GES to address the concerns raised by teachers and the public. Clear communication channels should be established to provide teachers with detailed information about the CPD point system, the penalties, and the process of deductions. Additionally, the GES should consider engaging in dialogue with teachers' associations and other stakeholders to ensure that the CPD system is fair, transparent, and supportive of teachers' professional growth.
Conclusion:
The alleged deductions of GH?150 from teachers' professional allowances for CPD points by the GES have ignited a social media controversy. While some argue that these penalties are necessary to enhance the quality of education, others are concerned about the lack of clarity and transparency in the process. It is essential for the GES to address these concerns and work towards a system that supports teachers' professional development while ensuring fairness and transparency in the deduction.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0