The departure of Erik ten Hag from Manchester United has cast a spotlight on the club’s ownership, with many questioning whether the club’s struggles lie more in the boardroom than the dugout. Ten Hag’s exit, after United’s disappointing slide to 14th in the Premier League, has led to criticism from the British press, who suggest United’s issues run deeper than managerial decisions.
For some, United's instability began months ago. The Times pointed to a tumultuous summer where Ten Hag’s authority appeared undermined. Despite a contract extension and pay raise following United’s FA Cup victory over Manchester City, it was widely reported that new co-owner Jim Ratcliffe and his Ineos group had already begun discussions with potential replacements. "How could he command the respect of his players when it was an open secret that the club had spoken with five or six candidates about the possibility of replacing him?" the Times commented, suggesting that these actions damaged Ten Hag's credibility with the team and fans.
The timing of the dismissal has also drawn criticism. The BBC questioned why the club waited, allowing high-profile managers like Mauricio Pochettino and Thomas Tuchel to secure other positions, with Pochettino leading the U.S. national team and Tuchel now England’s head coach. "Was it a case of admirable loyalty or a stubbornness that backfired?" the BBC asked, reflecting the frustration felt by many United supporters who believe poor timing and indecision worsened United's current predicament.
From a financial standpoint, Ten Hag’s departure comes with a significant cost, as reports suggest he will receive around £15 million in compensation. After another £200 million spent on summer signings, the Daily Mail noted that Ratcliffe has recently been focused on cost-cutting across the organization. However, the impact of such cuts, especially while managerial changes incur substantial fees, has raised concerns about priorities and long-term vision at Old Trafford. As the Mail put it, “Sir Jim Ratcliffe has watched Man United burn, ridding himself of little people while Erik ten Hag cost them hundreds of millions."
Meanwhile, fans remain divided. The Guardian published a United fan’s perspective lamenting the sacking. This fan argued that Ten Hag, unlike some of his predecessors, truly connected with United’s ethos, resonated with Old Trafford, and delivered results—two domestic trophies in two years. The opinion piece contrasted Ten Hag’s tenure with past managers like David Moyes and Jose Mourinho, who either "didn’t really ‘get’ the club" or became too divisive.
As the club moves forward, the discourse surrounding Ten Hag’s exit continues to raise "awkward questions" for United's owners. This period of scrutiny may lead to more fundamental changes, with fans and pundits alike hoping for a reset that restores stability and clarity to the Red Devils’ path forward.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0