Amidu Criticizes Chief Justice’s Decision to Close Courts Amidst Bawku Conflict
Former Special Prosecutor Martin Amidu has publicly criticized Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo’s decision to close down courts in Bawku, citing it as an ineffective response to the ongoing conflict in the region. The Chief Justice's directive, issued last week, ordered the temporary suspension of court activities in Bawku, where clashes between various factions have intensified, raising security concerns.
In a statement, Amidu expressed deep dissatisfaction with the Chief Justice's approach, arguing that suspending judicial services in Bawku is not only detrimental to the community but also an abdication of the judiciary's responsibility to ensure justice, even under challenging conditions. He stated that the directive signals a lack of commitment to uphold the rule of law in a region where peace and justice are most needed.
Amidu argued that, instead of shutting down the courts, the judiciary could have collaborated with security agencies to provide protection for court operations, thus ensuring that legal processes continue to function amid the crisis. “Justice must not be halted because of conflict; rather, the court system should play a role in resolving disputes, and the Chief Justice’s action is a disservice to Bawku,” he stated. “This decision only perpetuates a cycle of insecurity, as individuals cannot seek justice or address grievances through legal channels.”
Furthermore, Amidu highlighted the symbolic importance of the courts in maintaining order, especially during times of unrest. By closing the courts, he argued, the judiciary risks encouraging a culture of impunity, where disputes are resolved through violence rather than legal processes. He urged the Chief Justice to reconsider her stance and explore alternative solutions, including deploying more resources to support court security, rather than depriving Bawku residents of legal recourse.
The Chief Justice’s directive has sparked debate among legal professionals and citizens alike. Some argue that the temporary closure is a necessary step to protect judicial staff and civilians, while others side with Amidu, believing that access to justice is crucial during periods of crisis.
Amidu’s remarks have intensified discussions around the judiciary’s role in conflict resolution and the challenges faced in ensuring justice under volatile conditions. As the situation in Bawku continues to unfold, many are calling on government officials and security agencies to work alongside the judiciary in finding sustainable solutions that allow courts to operate safely, without compromising access to justice for the community.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0