Michael Jordan Tried To Warn NBA About Shooting Too Many 3-Pointers.
The three-point shot has become a polarizing topic in modern basketball, with critics arguing that its prominence is detracting from the overall appeal of the NBA. Many believe the league's heavy reliance on long-range shooting has made the game less engaging and dynamic, contributing to declining television ratings. This season, every team is averaging at least 30 three-point attempts per game, a stark contrast to past eras when the shot was used more strategically rather than as a central focus of offensive play.
Interestingly, this debate is not entirely new. In 1992, Michael Jordan, widely regarded as one of the greatest players in NBA history, seemingly foresaw the potential pitfalls of overemphasizing the three-pointer. During Game 1 of the NBA Finals against the Portland Trail Blazers, Jordan delivered an unforgettable performance, hitting six three-pointers in the first half and finishing the game with a dazzling 39 points. His shooting display, capped by his iconic shrug toward the sidelines, left fans and analysts in awe.
However, when asked after the game whether the three-point shot was becoming a bigger part of his arsenal, Jordan’s response was telling. He downplayed its importance, stating that focusing too heavily on three-pointers could hinder other aspects of his game. This perspective reflected Jordan’s philosophy as a player, emphasizing versatility, mid-range scoring, and an ability to adapt to different defensive challenges. For Jordan, the three-pointer was a tool, not a crutch.
Fast forward to today, and the NBA has evolved into a league where the three-point shot dominates. The rise of analytics has played a significant role, as data shows that three-pointers offer a higher return on investment compared to long two-point shots. This shift has led to a style of play heavily reliant on spacing, perimeter shooting, and quick scoring, reshaping the way teams construct rosters and strategize.
Critics, however, argue that the reliance on three-pointers has homogenized the game. They claim it reduces the importance of post-play, mid-range shooting, and physical battles in the paint—elements that once defined the sport. For some fans, the absence of these dynamics has made the game less entertaining and more predictable.
While supporters of the modern style point to the excitement of fast-paced, high-scoring games, the ongoing debate highlights a broader question about the balance between innovation and tradition in sports. As the league continues to evolve, the discussion around the three-point shot serves as a reminder of the tension between embracing new trends and preserving the essence of the game.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0