A recent debate in Ghana’s Parliament has sparked public discourse about appropriate attire in the legislative chamber. The controversy arose when a Member of Parliament (MP) questioned the appropriateness of a colleague’s outfit, a Cubavera shirt, worn by Alexander Afenyo-Markin, the Majority Leader in Parliament.
This incident has ignited conversations about Ghanaian fashion norms, the cultural significance of the Cubavera, and whether parliamentary dress codes should be revised to accommodate modern styles while maintaining decorum.
What is a Cubavera Shirt?
The Cubavera is a classic men’s shirt inspired by the traditional Cuban Guayabera, a lightweight, often short-sleeved, button-up shirt featuring vertical pleats. Originally designed for warm climates, it has evolved into a symbol of relaxed elegance, worn at both casual and formal events across Latin America and the Caribbean.
The Cubavera is known for its comfort, breathability, and versatility, making it a staple for those who prefer stylish yet functional clothing. It has become increasingly popular in various professional and social settings worldwide, including government functions in some countries.
The Parliamentary Controversy
During a recent parliamentary session, Alexander Afenyo-Markin arrived wearing a Cubavera, a departure from the conventional suit-and-tie attire often seen in Ghana’s Parliament. His choice of clothing drew criticism from a colleague, who deemed it “inappropriate” for the legislative house. This led to a discussion about what constitutes proper parliamentary attire and whether dress codes should be more flexible.
Some MPs argued that Ghana’s Parliament should uphold traditional professional attire, such as suits or locally tailored formal wear. Others suggested that the rules should be more accommodating, considering Ghana’s tropical climate and the evolving nature of formal dress codes worldwide.
The Debate on Dress Code in Parliament
This is not the first time attire has been a subject of debate in Ghana’s Parliament. In previous years, there have been discussions about whether African prints, traditional garments, and even smart casual wear should be accepted in the chamber.
Arguments for Relaxing the Dress Code:
Climate Considerations – Ghana’s hot and humid climate makes suits uncomfortable, and allowing breathable attire like the Cubavera could enhance MPs' comfort and productivity.
Global Fashion Trends – Around the world, many legislative bodies are adapting their dress codes to reflect modern fashion sensibilities while maintaining decorum.
Cultural Identity – African nations have unique sartorial traditions, and incorporating more locally inspired or regionally accepted styles like the Cubavera could promote cultural expression.
Precedents from Other Countries – Several parliaments, including those in the Caribbean and Latin America, allow traditional yet stylish garments similar to the Cubavera.
Arguments for Maintaining Strict Dress Codes:
Preserving Formality – Some believe that allowing casual attire may lead to a decline in the level of decorum and respect associated with Parliament.
Professional Image – A formal dress code helps maintain a professional image for legislators, both locally and internationally.
Uniformity and Tradition – Maintaining a strict dress code ensures uniformity and prevents subjective interpretations of what is appropriate.
Public Reaction to the Cubavera Controversy
The public reaction to the Cubavera debate has been mixed. While some support Afenyo-Markin’s choice, arguing that Ghana should modernize its dress code policies, others insist that Parliament should adhere to strict professional standards.
On social media, many Ghanaians expressed their views:
“We need to focus on more pressing national issues rather than debating someone’s shirt.”
“The world is evolving. Why should MPs be forced to wear suits when they can dress smartly in something more comfortable?”
“Parliament has rules for a reason. If we allow this, what’s next? T-shirts and jeans?”
The debate has also drawn comparisons to the acceptance of African prints and traditional wear in Ghanaian politics. If local fabrics are considered formal attire, why shouldn’t a Cubavera, which is widely accepted in other warm-climate regions, be permissible?
Should Ghana’s Parliament Update Its Dress Code?
This incident raises the broader question of whether Ghana’s Parliament should reassess its dress code to reflect contemporary realities. Many institutions globally are adopting more relaxed but professional dress standards, especially in warmer climates where traditional suits may not be practical.
If Parliament considers revising its dress code, key factors to consider would include:
Defining acceptable alternatives to Western formal attire
Ensuring that relaxed dress codes do not compromise professionalism
Respecting cultural and traditional elements in official wear
Conclusion
The Cubavera controversy in Ghana’s Parliament underscores the ongoing evolution of fashion norms in professional spaces. While some argue that strict dress codes maintain professionalism, others believe that Parliament should embrace modern, climate-friendly alternatives like the Cubavera.
Ultimately, the debate reflects a larger cultural conversation about identity, tradition, and modernization in Ghana. Whether or not the Cubavera becomes a staple in Ghanaian politics, this incident has undoubtedly sparked a necessary discussion about balancing decorum with comfort in professional settings.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0