The Attorney General and Minister for Justice, Dr. Dominic Ayine, has come out in defense of President John Dramani Mahama's actions regarding the removal of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo. Dr. Ayine firmly rejected calls for the President to suspend proceedings related to determining a prima facie case on petitions seeking the Chief Justice's removal.
Background of the Case
The Supreme Court adjourned the injunction application aimed at halting the President and the Council of State from advancing the process to May 6, 2025. The adjournment was due to the absence of one of the five Justices, His Lordship Samuel Asiedu. The injunction application was filed by lawyer Godfred Yeboah Dame, seeking to prevent the President from continuing with the petition review until the Supreme Court delivers its ruling.
Attorney General's Defense
Dr. Ayine defended the President's actions, emphasizing his constitutional obligation to proceed with the process. He questioned the legal basis of the calls to halt proceedings, stating that the court has yet to make an order. Dr. Ayine asserted that the President is performing his constitutional duty and that the law is clear on the matter.
Constitutional Clarity
The Attorney General emphasized that the President's actions are guided by the constitution, which outlines the procedure for removing a Chief Justice. Dr. Ayine argued that the President is not bound by the injunction application and that the court has not granted an order to halt the process.
Implications of the Ruling
The outcome of this case will have significant implications for the country's judicial system and the rule of law. If the Supreme Court grants the injunction, it could potentially halt the removal process, giving the Chief Justice a reprieve. On the other hand, if the court dismisses the injunction application, the President can proceed with the petition review, which could lead to the Chief Justice's removal.
Key Points
- Constitutional Mandate: The President is performing his constitutional duty in proceeding with the petition review.
- Injunction Application: The Supreme Court adjourned the injunction application to May 6, 2025, due to the absence of one of the Justices.
- Rule of Law: The outcome of this case will have significant implications for the country's judicial system and the rule of law.
- Separation of Powers: The case highlights the delicate balance between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government.
In conclusion, the Attorney General's defense of President Mahama's actions underscores the importance of constitutional clarity and the rule of law in guiding the removal process of high-ranking officials like the Chief Justice. As the Supreme Court prepares to deliver its ruling, the country waits with bated breath to see how this critical issue will be resolved.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0