The New Patriotic Party (NPP) has been at the forefront of Ghana's democratic process, consistently demonstrating its commitment to introspection and institutional learning. According to Haruna Mohammed, Deputy General Secretary of the NPP, the party's tradition of setting up committees to review electoral performance is not a recent development or a borrowed strategy from the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC). Instead, it is a long-standing practice that dates back to the party's early days.
A Historical Perspective
In 1992, the NPP rejected the presidential election results, citing irregularities and unfair practices. In response, the party established a committee to investigate the matter and produce a comprehensive report. This landmark report, known as "The Stolen Verdict," was a collaborative effort by a group of esteemed individuals appointed by the NPP. Haruna Mohammed emphasized that this practice has been consistent within the party, regardless of victory or defeat.
Consistent Practice
The NPP has a history of setting up committees to review its electoral performance. For instance, after winning the 2020 elections, the party established the Osafo Maafo committee to examine its campaign strategies and identify areas for improvement. Similarly, following the 2024 election loss, the party set up a committee led by Professor Michael Ocquaye to investigate the reasons behind the defeat. According to Haruna Mohammed, these committees are part of the party's DNA, enabling it to learn from its experiences and adapt to changing circumstances.
Not Copying, But Tradition
Haruna Mohammed dismissed suggestions that the NPP is copying the NDC's strategy, emphasizing that the party's tradition of setting up committees is rooted in its history and values. "We do this whether we win or lose," he said, highlighting the party's commitment to introspection and institutional learning. This approach allows the NPP to identify areas for improvement, develop effective strategies, and maintain its relevance in Ghana's dynamic political landscape.
Significance of Election Review Committees
Election review committees play a crucial role in helping political parties like the NPP to evaluate their performance, identify weaknesses, and develop strategies for improvement. By examining the party's electoral performance, these committees can provide valuable insights into the factors that contributed to success or failure. This information can then be used to inform future campaign strategies, improve party organization, and enhance the party's overall effectiveness.
Challenges and Controversies
While the NPP's tradition of setting up committees has been consistent, it has not been without controversy. Former Dome-Kwabenya MP Sarah Adwoa Safo, for instance, has criticized the party's election review committee, describing it as "bogus" and questioning the suitability of Professor Mike Ocquaye as chairman. Haruna Mohammed responded to these criticisms, emphasizing that the committee was established by the National Council, the second-highest decision-making body of the party, and that its members are respectable individuals tasked with examining the party's electoral defeat.
Conclusion
The NPP's tradition of setting up committees to review its electoral performance is a testament to the party's commitment to introspection and institutional learning. By examining its experiences, identifying areas for improvement, and adapting to changing circumstances, the NPP can maintain its relevance and effectiveness in Ghana's dynamic political landscape. As Haruna Mohammed emphasized, this practice is not borrowed from the NDC but is an integral part of the NPP's DNA, reflecting its values and approach to politics.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0