Communications Minister Denies Political Motive Behind Radio Station Suspensions.
Communications Minister Sam Nartey George has dismissed claims that the recent suspension of six radio stations by the National Communications Authority (NCA) was politically motivated.
Speaking on Joy News’ PM Express on Tuesday, April 15, the Ningo Prampram MP emphasized that the suspensions were based strictly on legal grounds, not party affiliations or media ownership.
“Three of the six stations I suspended are owned by individuals affiliated with the NDC,” he said. “If this were politically driven, why would I shut down stations linked to my own party? I’m simply applying the law.”
George clarified that he had no prior knowledge of who owned the affected stations when the suspensions were recommended.
“When I requested information on outstanding frequency authorisations, I didn’t ask for the ownership details—just the names of the non-compliant companies,” he noted.
He described what followed as a familiar pattern in Ghanaian politics:
“As people began pleading—as is typical in Ghana—I started realizing some of the names involved. But I’m not influenced by status or connections. The law is the law, no matter who you are.”
The Minister further revealed that he met with Sulemana Braimah, Executive Director of the Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA), to address concerns about media freedom.
“I invited him to the Ministry, presented the facts about the six stations, and even showed him the list of the 53 others with outstanding issues. He now understands the basis of our actions, which is why the MFWA hasn’t made further public comments.”
George said he plans to brief Parliament soon, providing evidence to demonstrate the legality and neutrality of the suspensions.
“I will present everything to Parliament to show this is not political. The law must apply to everyone equally.”
He concluded by stressing that the move is about accountability, not censorship.
“This is not about silencing voices. It’s about ensuring that everyone—regardless of influence or ownership—meets their legal obligations.”
blogpay
Total Comments: 0