Fuseini Slams NPP Over Chief Justice Defence in Removal Saga
Former Tamale Central MP, Inusah Fuseini, has stirred fresh debate in Ghana’s political landscape after sharply criticising the New Patriotic Party (NPP) for what he described as an inappropriate and damaging stance in the ongoing legal discussions surrounding the potential removal of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo. Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile programme, Fuseini voiced concerns that the NPP's vocal defence of the Chief Justice risks sending the wrong message to the public and could tarnish the impartial image of the judiciary.
According to him, it is a constitutional misstep for a political party to insert itself so deeply into a matter that should remain above partisan politics. Fuseini argued that the perception of a politically aligned judiciary is one of the most dangerous threats to democratic governance and judicial independence. He cautioned that if care is not taken, the NPP's actions might compromise public trust in the justice system, especially at a time when scrutiny and integrity are paramount.
Drawing from previous events, Fuseini noted that the Chief Justice had already faced a similar petition in 2024, and instead of dismissing new concerns outright, there should be room for open and objective discussions. He insisted that every Ghanaian deserves the right to question public officeholders, regardless of how powerful they may be. What disturbs him, he explained, is not that there are calls for inquiry, but rather the swift and seemingly aggressive defence mounted by the NPP, which he believes does more harm than good.
He further criticised the party for deploying its legal allies to challenge the President’s constitutional duties in court, suggesting that many of those raising legal objections to presidential involvement appear to be aligned with the NPP. For Fuseini, such legal resistance, especially when visibly partisan, only complicates the broader conversation around justice, accountability, and national unity.
“It is becoming increasingly uncomfortable to even talk about the Chief Justice,” he said, highlighting how political influence appears to cloud a position meant to serve the entire Republic of Ghana, not a political faction. He called on the NPP to reflect on its conduct and understand that overzealous involvement in such sensitive issues can backfire politically and institutionally.
He maintained that defending the Chief Justice should not be the prerogative of a political party, especially when the role demands neutrality and trust from all corners of society. Fuseini believes that the judiciary should stand as a pillar of balance, not entangled in party narratives. His comments have sparked new conversations about how political parties engage with constitutional processes and the boundaries they must respect.
This ongoing controversy continues to draw national attention as citizens await clarity on the matter. While calls for calm and due process grow louder, Fuseini's remarks have reignited the debate on the role of politics in Ghana’s legal and institutional affairs, raising serious questions about judicial independence and the long-term implications of partisan interference.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0