The Ghana Institute of Procurement and Supply (GIPS) has denied the enrollment of the previous Chief Official Officer of the Public Procurement Authority (PPA), Mr. James Agyenim Boateng Adjei.
This was contained in a articulation, issued by the Founded on Tuesday, Walk 8, 2022.
Concurring to GIPs, the choice to portion ways with the previous PPA boss was premised on his failure to respect a arrangement of solicitations relating to charges leveled against him.
“GIPS wishes to formally advise the common open that in line with the recommendations from CHRAJ, coupled with the truth that Mr. A.B Adjei fizzled to honor an welcome to seem some time recently the Founded’s Morals & Proficient Measures Committee to reply to the affirmations leveled against him, his GIPS enrollment has formally been pulled back.
In this way, Mr. Adjei cannot utilize the title FGIPS or hold himself as a part of this Proficient Body for the following ten a long time”, the articulation examined.
The Founded moreover commended the Commission for Human Rights and Regulatory Equity (CHRAJ), for their discoveries, relating to the acquirement breaches, leveled against Mr. Adjei.
“The Ghana Founded of Acquirement and Supply (GIPS) has examined the substance of the official report dated February 11, 2022, by the Commission on Human Rights and Regulatory Equity (CHRAJ).
In line with Article 286 of the Structure of the Republic of Ghana and per the Open Office Holder (Affirmation of Asset and Preclusion Act 1998 (Act 550), GIPS wishes to praise the Commission for the meticulousness of the examinations and a few of the related recommendations.
GIPS too bolsters other State Teach mandated to explore and arraign open and private authorities in Ghana’s acquirement-related debasement exercises”, parcels of the explanation examined.
The GIPS said, “The Organized is committed to working with all stakeholders and state organizations to chart a common way within the battle against obtainment-related debasement in Ghana”.
In the interim, the Accra Tall Court has tossed out an application by the previous PPA boss, which looked for to set aside the discoveries of the Commission on Human Rights and Regulatory Equity (CHRAJ) against him.
Mr. James Adjenim Boateng Adjei fought that CHRAJ acted in breach of characteristic equity and fizzled to allow him a reasonable hearing amid its examinations into the ‘Contract for Deal’ adventure.
Concurring to him, CHRAJ never gave him the chance to cross-look at witnesses displayed within the case.
“By denying me the opportunity to get to, react and cross-look at articulations, witnesses and prove that the respondents depended on to reach at their choice, CHRAJ acted in breach of common equity and fizzled to deliver me a reasonable hearing,” he said in his lawsuit.