Please like and part this article. Don't not recall to set aside a state below. desire catch on me for new updates.
A constituent of the official side of the native self-governing assembly (NDC), Lawyer Abraham Amaliba has discovered that really he agrees with a quantity of of the Supreme invite judges on Mr. James Gekye Quayson's case. He bare that, they got their ruling right.
On April 13, 2022, the Supreme quad ruled that Mr. James Gyekye Quayson cannot carry on to enfold himself as a appendage of congress for the Assin North Constituency. This was a manhood 5-2 resolution by the Justices or Judges of the Supreme Court.
While spoken language on TV3 type Points on Saturday, April 16, 2022, Abraham Amaliba reveals that unvarying although he doesn't be the same with the entirety of the Supreme cozy up to ruling, he agrees with the two justices or judges who ruled for Mr. Quayson for the reason that they interpreted the constitution well.
He plus exposed that the client was criminal to move out to the Supreme incite at what time it comes to Parliamentary petitions.
"The two judges who dissented their opinion, for me, is the as it should be thinking of the law. If in attendance is a subsisting verdict you don’t proceed to the Supreme Court, asking the Supreme ask for to as it were, enforce it and that as this is an appointment lobby material you don’t clothe it in an interpretative originate and throw it to the Supreme Court."
“For Parliamentary petitions, it locks of hair at the see of attraction and you axiom the two judges give rise to reference of this and I ponder that their put is the correct.” Lawyer Abraham Amaliba revealed.
He continuous to in addition bring to light that, Mr. James Gyekye Quayson rest the part of house for Assin North but he righteous cannot execute the duties of a appendage of Parliament.
What's your hold on this article? complete you see eye to eye
blogpay
Total Comments: 0