Obviously, we wouldn't require the IMF assuming the public authority doesn't as a rule joke around about recuperating these lost and taken monies, and afterward stopping the openings that permitted them to be lost or taken in any case.
Restriction and SURCHARGE
Benevolently, the composers of our Constitution had adequate prescience on these issues and accordingly depended the Auditor-General to, past just leading reviews and delivering editorial reports, forbid illegitimate use and overcharge individuals who either cause misfortunes or take our monies.
Likewise, the 2000 Audit Service Act explicitly engaged the Attorney-General to make a legitimate move to recuperate the monies, where the people overcharged don't pay following 60 days.
However, for right around 25 years after the Constitution came into force, these fine regulations essentially decorated the pages of our resolution books, and neither the public authority nor the Auditor-General found a way some way to uphold them.
What we were exposed to was the yearly act where the Auditor-General gave faltering and manageable Reports, did no denial or overcharge, and afterward passed the mallet to Parliament's incompetently named Public Accounts Committee to proceed with the act with broadcast hearings that didn't recuperate a pesewa of the lost or taken reserves.
High COURT JUDGMENT
It needed to take OccupyGhana, shaped exclusively in 2014, to go to the Supreme Court to show the Auditor-General how to peruse and comprehend the basic powers that the Constitution had vested in that office. Fortunately, the legal executive in June 2017, tossed out every one of the guards that the public authority set facing our case, including the insultingly foolish and risible complaint that we didn't have the ability to prosecute the public authority. The legal executive additionally overlooked the conspicuously misleading case by the then Auditor-General that its Management Letters comprised the forbiddances and overcharges that the Constitution requested.
Ghana's legal executive defended Ghana when it collectively requested both the Auditor-General and the Attorney-General to do what is compulsorily expected of them by both the Constitution and the Audit Service Act.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0