The Sex Position That Will Increase Your Satisfaction
The only thing that intimacy is about is pleasure. As opposed to married couples who do it out of love for one another. People engage in intimate interactions because intimacy by itself includes the desire and pleasure they want. Certain factors are taken into account in order to achieve the desired level of satisfaction. like the stances they strike to increase orgasm and penetration. Most people are familiar with a few of these poses, which are regarded as the best poses ever for greater fulfillment.
You may be puzzling. What is the optimum stance to get the most satisfaction, then? the stance fit for a dog. The most popular stance that people want to try and think is very beautiful is this one. Better penetration is possible during intimacy in this close-quarters position. It is not a difficult stance that individuals cannot perform; in fact, this pose is more comfortable than others.
As a result, there is no face-to-face interaction between the counterparts when in this posture. Because neither person needs to look at the other, they can both focus on making themselves happy. Additionally, penetration is much more pleasant and deeper. This posture is ideal for couples to be in while being intimate.
Therefore, we suggest that the concept of sexual satisfaction for heterosexual adults in an exclusive dyadic, cohabiting relationship could be characterized as the emotional experience of regular mutual sexual pleasure. Interpersonal exchange models are the main source of inspiration for current sexual satisfaction models.
As "an affective response deriving from one's subjective judgment of the positive and negative qualities linked with one's sexual connection," sexual satisfaction was described (Lawrance & Byers, 1995, p. 514). According to Rusbult (1983), partners experience sexual satisfaction when their profits (rewards minus expenses) exceed their perceptions of what they should receive, when the gain is roughly equal for both partners, or when they feel like they were treated fairly (Sprecher & Cate, 2004).
blogpay
Total Comments: 0