A US judge has requested that Twitter's claim against Elon Musk go to preliminary in October, a catastrophe for the world's most extravagant man who had requested a postponement.
Mr Musk left his $44bn (£36bn) bid to purchase Twitter before in July, provoking the organization to sue him.
Twitter trusts that the court will arrange Mr Musk to finish the takeover at the concurred cost of $54.20 per share.
The tech tycoon has blamed Twitter for keeping data about counterfeit records.
His lawful group has required the preliminary to be held right on time one year from now because of its intricacies, however Twitter requested a September date.
Delay undermines hopeless damage," Chancellor Kathaleen St Jude McCormick said. "The more extended the deferral, the more prominent the gamble."
claim blamed Mr Musk for a "extensive rundown" of infringement in front of the expected consolidation and contended that he had "cast a pall" over the organization.
At the conference on Tuesday, Twitter's lead counsel William Savitt said the continuous vulnerability regarding regardless of whether the takeover would go ahead "incurs hurt for Twitter regular".
They guaranteed they required additional opportunity to dig through information on spam accounts. Obviously however this is likewise a slowing down technique.
They rehashed Mr Musk's declaration that Twitter might have more phony records than it claims.
That is an enormously harming allegation - and an unusual comment assuming that Mr Musk were as yet keen on buying the organization at a lower cost.
Twitter's standing has proactively endured a gigantic shot. Twitter's incomes are primarily founded on promotions. The less genuine individuals on the stage, the less cash it can make. Bots don't have wallets.
That is the reason Twitter needs this cycle arranged rapidly. By a long shot the most ideal situation for the organization is that Mr Musk gets it for $54.20 an offer - and that it occurs quickly.
That is the reason this judgment is uplifting news for Twitter. The adjudicator favored Twitter's legal counselors - that a decision should have been reached rapidly.
It stores more strain on Mr Musk, who is confronted with the odd possibility of purchasing an organization he no longer wishes to get.
In any case, practically speaking this will probably come down on Mr Musk to settle, pay Twitter some cash, and continue on.
<
"Musk has been and remains authoritatively committed to utilize his earnest attempts to settle the negotiation," Mr Savitt said. "What he's doing is the very inverse. It's damage."
A legal counselor for Mr Musk, Andrew Rossman, contended that he stays perhaps of Twitter's most huge investor. He said the case ought to go to preliminary one year from now on a "reasonable" plan that would give the two sides time to get ready.
Since Mr Musk started scrutinizing the quantity of phony and spam accounts on Twitter's foundation in May, the organization has seen its portion costs tumble from highs of $50 per share.
The organization's portions presently stand at about $39.45 - well beneath the $54.20 per share at which it desires to close the consolidation.
A self-portrayed "free discourse absolutist", Mr Musk has promised to ease limitations on happy on the off chance that the organization were under his proprietorship.
He has likewise required the organization to be more open about how it presents tweets to clients and how tweets are elevated to bigger crowds.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0