Friday

December 27th , 2024

FOLLOW US

YOUR 'SCANDALOUS' JUDGMENTS WITHOUT REASONS 'DON'T MAKE LEGAL, FACTUAL SENSE' ? NDC SLAMS SC 2

featured img
News

2 years ago



It noticed: "Exactly as expected, the pinnacle court again applied this outrageous strategy on account of the Republic versus High Court, (Criminal Division) Accra; Ex parte: Stephen Kwabena Opuni and Anor (Civil Motion J5/15/22). The equity hearing the crook case including Dr. Stephen Kwabena Opuni, Mr. Justice Clemence Jackson Honyenuga, had in a new decision on an application to recuse himself on ground of genuine probability of predisposition charged Dr. Stephen Kwabena Opuni of 'daydreaming', 'malevolent untruths', 'designed to court public help'".

 

"In its decision on this, the summit court expressed that: 'It is our viewed as assessment that the record doesn't mirror an individual interest by the preliminary appointed authority in the issues in issue and the creation of prejudicial orders to warrant the award of a request for certiorari to subdue the procedures and orders of the preliminary court dated sixteenth December 2021. Concerning application for disallowance we have completely inspected the cycles recorded by the gatherings and don't find the presence of a genuine probability of predisposition with respect to the preliminary adjudicator, for example, would forestall the direct of a fair preliminary by the adjudicator. As needs be, we excuse the application in its entirety]'".

 

This decision, the NDC noted, "is additionally without the authentic grid of the case, the case and contentions introduced by the gatherings, the legitimate standards whereupon the judgment is based, and the way in which those lawful standards apply or don't make a difference to current realities of the case".

 

"The NDC takes note of that the peculiarity of unreasoned court decisions has become so typical particularly in cases with high political stakes. The NDC considers how the zenith court could cause public trust in the organization of equity and stay responsible to individuals when it expects a determined stance of delivering unreasoned decisions. The NDC accepts that unreasoned decisions disregard major standards of equity and fair preliminary, and we puzzle over whether this peculiarity of unreasoned decisions is a reasonable indication of desolation of legal obligations", Mr Nketia added.

 

 

To be continued...

Total Comments: 0

Meet the Author


PC
Gifty's BlogGH

Content writer

follow me

INTERSTING TOPICS


Connect and interact with amazing Authors in our twitter community