Immigration chief sues Johnnie Hughes and TV3 for GH20 million in defamation.
The Representative General of the Ghana immigration service, Kwame Asuah Takyi has sued the supervisors of TV3, Media General over a few claimed episodes of slander.
The suit which makes GH¢20 million interest in punitive fees likewise named the host of the morning show on the TV station, Johnnie Hughes as a co-respondent.
As per subtleties of the suit distributed by Dailyguidenetwork.com, the host on the Johnnies Nibble, a fragment on the show, offered expressions that were disparaging to the individual of the Movement Administration chief.
"Officer General, you were prohibited in 2013. That is what your officials are talking about for similar visa misrepresentation and license acts of neglect. As of your 2019/2020 since your mandate came, you are carrying that multitude of pets to you. Individuals are asking to pose inquiries once more. What are you doing? Is it true that you are accomplishing something once more?
"They say they don't have the foggiest idea about why you have attempted to concentrate everything when you have made blameworthy previously and went on prohibition. Until 2017, you were prohibited five (5) years.
"The debasement should stop, Takyi should go" the suit rehashed a few explanations said to have been made by the writer between August 24 and September 23, 2022, on the program.
As per the offended party, the columnist by his proclamations portrayed him as a bad authority who treats his officials unreasonably and inadequately and too utilizes his office to settle private matters with different officials.
Kwame Asuah Takyi likewise affirmed that the distribution by the writer has made right reasoning people accept he has a sketchy person and is ill suited to satisfy his order as Specialist General. The offended party added that the respondent made right reasoning people view him as utilizing his office to improve himself.
The claims by the columnist, as per Mr Kwame Asuah Takyi, are bogus and determined to mark his picture and lower his standing in the eyes and psyches of right reasoning individuals from people in general.
The offended party considers the assertion by the writer to be slanderous and has asked as a feature of his requests that the litigants are requested by a court to withdraw and erase the distribution from its different media stages, sites, chronicles or records.
He is additionally requesting an inadequate expression of remorse through similar medium where the assertions and distributions were made against him.
Likewise, the Migration Administration manager is requesting a prize of GHC20 million in punitive fees as well as a request controlling the litigants or chosen ones from additional distribution or causing to be distributed the said words or some other words.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0