Friday

May 17th , 2024

FOLLOW US
pc

Kwasi York

A year ago

BREAKING: COURT DISMISSES ANAS' 25 MILLION DEFAMATION SUIT AGAINST KENNEDY AGYAPONG

featured img
News

A year ago

 the Defamation case between MP Kennedy Ohene Agyapong and Anas Court dismisses Anas' 25 million defamation suit against Kennedy Ohene Agyapong and describes it as meritless! "Plaintiff(Anas) is a blackmailer, extortionist and corrupt." and his style isn't investigative journalism but investigative terrorism."- according to the Judge

In a recent court ruling, the defamation suit filed by investigative journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas against Member of Parliament (MP) Kennedy Ohene Agyapong has been dismissed by the court. The court declared that the suit was without merit and that the allegations made by Agyapong against Anas were not defamatory.

The case had been ongoing for several months, with Anas alleging that Agyapong had defamed him in various statements made on radio and television. Agyapong had accused Anas of being a "blackmailer, extortionist, and corrupt" and had described his style of journalism as "investigative terrorism." Anas had sought 25 million Ghanaian cedis in damages from Agyapong for the alleged defamation.


However, the court found that Agyapong's statements did not meet the threshold for defamation, as they were not intended to harm Anas' reputation. The judge noted that Agyapong's statements were made in the context of a public debate on the methods used by Anas in his investigative work, and were not made with the intent to harm Anas personally.

In his ruling, the judge also criticized Anas for his methods of investigation, describing them as "entrapment" and "deception." The judge noted that while Anas' work had exposed corruption in Ghana, his methods had also raised questions about the ethics of investigative journalism.

The ruling has been met with mixed reactions, with some observers praising the court for defending freedom of speech and expression, while others have criticized the judge's comments on Anas' methods of investigation. The case has highlighted the challenges facing investigative journalists in Ghana, who often face threats and harassment for their work.

Overall, the ruling in the defamation suit between Anas and Agyapong underscores the importance of responsible journalism and the need for journalists to adhere to ethical standards in their work. While investigative journalism can play a crucial role in exposing corruption and holding those in power accountable, it must be done in a responsible and ethical manner that respects the rights and dignity of all involved.

Meet the Author


PC
Kwasi York

Content writer

follow me

INTERSTING TOPICS


Connect and interact with amazing Authors in our twitter community