Juve's decision: Revocation of the 15-point penalty awaiting a fresh trial
The FIGC Federal Court of Appeal must reassess since Juventus' 15-point Serie A punishment has been lifted pending a new trial to further clarify the capital gains problem.
Any punishment would be for the 2023–24 season, whether it came quickly or took longer than the season's finish.
Juve moves up to third position in Serie A right away with 59 points, knocking Roma to fourth, Milan to fifth, and Inter to sixth.
The sanctions imposed on Fabio Paratici, the current director of Tottenham Hotspur, Federico Cherubini, Andrea Agnelli, and Maurizio Arrivabene are not lifted, nevertheless.
A number of board members, including Pavel Nedved, have been totally exonerated.
Since the three-hour hearing on Wednesday afternoon at the Collegio di Garanzia, this decision had grown more plausible.
The CONI prosecutor Ugo Taucer took the FIGC's place at the appeal because they failed to provide any evidence, thereby admitting that the decision "has a lack of clarity in the motivation that must be appreciated and evaluated by a new judgment."
The case will be contested again, likely with even more evidence implicating other teams, despite the fact that Juventus' attorneys had pushed to have the entire judgement overturned and put an end to it here.
The FIGC's decision to impose a 15-point penalty despite its own prosecutor Giuseppe Chinè's plea for just nine points in punishment has raised questions.January.
The court is required to explain the "causal nature" of the 15-point penalty for behavior that, in reality, had no direct impact on the outcomes in today's appeal ruling, which explicitly makes reference to this.
It will be the third time that Juventus' case has come before the Federal Court of Justice for a ruling.
There are also unanswered issues regarding why, in April 2022, all 11 teams and 59 individuals were cleared of unlawfully inflating transfer fees to increase capital gains, yet only Juventus had their status reversed.
The court at the time determined that there was no alternative reliable method of determining a player's value for Juventus, Napoli, Sampdoria, Genoa, Empoli, Parma, Pisa, Pescara, Novara, Chievo, and Pro Vercelli. than the fee two clubs agreed to.
Juve alone had that verdict overturned on appeal in January 2023 because of new evidence in the form of wiretaps provided by the Prisma police investigation.
Pavel Nedved, Paolo Galimberti, Assia Grazzioli-Venier, Caitlin Mary Hughes, Daniela Marilungo, and Francesco Roncaglio have also been declared innocent, according to the decision.
However, because their appeals were denied, Agnelli, Paratici, Cherubini, and Arrivabene will also have their bans temporarily lifted pending a new trial.
blogpay
