Social media is in a state of discussion after a female Twitter user revealed what women are mainly after and what they need when they are in a relationship with you. In this era, most women are regarded as gold diggers due to the actions portrayed by many, we have witnessed instances where women divorce their husbands and take custody of their wealth. Most women are also in relationships with men they claim they love and yet cheat on them based on the fact that they can't provide for their various needs. A Twitter user identified as @hey_jinae made a tweet and revealed that, most women are not interested in the wealth and looks of men, but rather interested in how they treat them.
Her assertions sparked a whole lot of conversations as many disagreed with her assertions and made them false. A few of the opinions shared by users are highlighted below;
@prenkuchan •
“Yeah? How likely are you to marry a penniless beggar as long as he treats you well? Why do humans like to pretend presentation doesn't matter to them?”.
@dzmxna •
“Deluluuu, I'd understand wealth, but looks? You're lying to yourself. You somewhat still need to be physically attracted to the person. You need the full package. Looks are important to an extent”.
@ASR here •
“When you say women, you mean you and few
others that you know, right? Because there are plenty who don't fit that bill”
Shemz@sashanaye_•
“I call it PTO (Princess Treatment Only). I'm your
princess, so you're not about to treat me any less
than that”.
@Musonda Bweupe•gh
“True but I'm definitely interested in the way you
dress I need to be proud of you”.
@iggy49 •
“Trust me women are absolutely interested in your
health, wealth and looks as well as how you treat
them. And Don't trust”.
@PrncessCaecilia •
“So l don't agree with this. At all. Also I think it's backward thinking because how someone treats you is in fact not everything. As a woman you are allowed to want certain things in a partner. Be that wealth, looks, intelligence or something else. I would never be with someone”.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0