Alan Kyerematen, leader of the Movement for Change, has come under fire following his remarks directed at former President John Agyekum Kufuor. The controversy began after Kufuor, in a public statement on November 17, endorsed Vice President Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia as the most capable candidate to lead Ghana in the upcoming elections.
Speaking in support of Dr. Bawumia, Kufuor emphasized his economic expertise, recalling his contributions as part of the Bank of Ghana’s team during Kufuor’s presidency. “Considering the present global context, I genuinely believe Ghana’s economy would witness substantial growth if Bawumia were elected as President,” Kufuor said.
However, Alan Kyerematen, in an interview on Oyerepa TV on November 18, criticized Kufuor’s endorsement, suggesting it was inappropriate for someone of his stature to wade into partisan politics. “Kufuor is my uncle, and I hesitate to publicly criticize him,” Kyerematen noted, adding, “but his endorsement has sparked significant public backlash. He is venturing into dangerous territory that risks tarnishing his legacy.”
Kyerematen also implied that the former president’s involvement in active political commentary could undermine his respected status.
Allotey Jacobs Responds
Political commentator Bernard Allotey Jacobs strongly rebuked Kyerematen’s remarks, suggesting they signal the end of his political career. Speaking on Peace FM’s Kokrokoo program, Jacobs condemned Kyerematen’s comments as disrespectful, especially toward someone he believes played a pivotal role in shaping Kyerematen’s political journey.
“Alan Kyerematen owes much of his political rise to President Kufuor. For him to criticize Kufuor in this manner shows a lack of gratitude,” Jacobs argued. He further dismissed Kyerematen’s claim that he was instrumental in 70% of Kufuor’s policies as deceptive and unsubstantiated.
Jacobs pointed out that Kufuor has always upheld democratic principles and that his endorsement of Dr. Bawumia aligns with his personal convictions about leadership and Ghana’s economic future. “It is unfortunate for Alan to suggest that Kufuor’s decision is reckless or politically motivated,” Jacobs stated.
A Broader Implication
The exchange highlights the tension within Ghana’s political landscape as the country heads toward a crucial election. Kyerematen’s criticism underscores the growing divide among political actors, while Kufuor’s endorsement reflects the weight of legacy figures in shaping electoral discourse.
The debate also raises questions about the role of past leaders in active politics and the implications for party unity and public perception. As the 2024 elections approach, such confrontations could shape narratives about leadership, loyalty, and the future of Ghana’s governance.
blogpay
Total Comments: 0