Sunday

September 8th , 2024

FOLLOW US
pc

Frank Abugri

2 years ago

DECKER WALKER'S CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT MODEL

featured img

Decker Walker's curriculum model (1971)

 

 

 

Resa R. Noel PhD., MPhil., B.A., DipEd

Resa R. Noel PhD., MPhil., B.A., DipEd

Oct. 17, 2015

 

 

Walker's deliberative approach emphasizes the process of curriculum development. The ways of proceeding were not predetermined but negotiated and documented as stakeholders worked towards completing the task.

 

Read more

Education

Recommended

 

SCHOOL-BASED ICT PLANS IN PRIMARY EDUCATION:ELEMENTS,TYPOLOGIES AND UNDERLYIN...

syaabdulrahman

 

BESA Conference 2014 - Glasgow - Teacher agency and education policy change -...

Paul Campbell

 

TSL3143 Topic 2a Models of Curriculum Design

Yee Bee Choo

 

The Learning Portfolio in Higher Education: A Game of Snakes and Ladders

Mark Brown

 

Argumentative Writing ppt - Grades 10-11 / Forms 4 - 5

Resa R. Noel PhD., MPhil., B.A., DipEd

 

DESCRIBING PLACES

Resa R. Noel PhD., MPhil., B.A., DipEd

More Related Content

You Might Also Like

Related Books

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

Related Audiobooks

Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd

See all

 Decker Walker's curriculum model (1971)

1. Decker Walker's Naturalistic Model (1971) Introduction to Curriculum Theory and Practice 08.10.15 R. Noel and N. Robinson

2. Brief biography of Decker DECKER WALKER was and assistant professor of education at Stan- ford University, where he received his Ph.D. in 1971.  His specialty was curriculum, and his major interests are the process of curriculum development and curriculum policy making.

3. What is the naturalistic model? A descriptive model in contrast to the classical model (prescriptive model) by Tyler et. Al (1949). It is also called the communicative approach. The communicative approach starts with the more subjective perceptions and views of the designers, the target group, and other stakeholders.

4. The term naturalistic describes how the process of curriculum planning is done instead of suggesting how it should be done Walker suggests that better curriculum planning and development will result if persons participated in the process and reached a consensus about the final product.

5. The model comprises of three phases of curriculum planning – platform, deliberation and design  Figure 1: Walker’s Model (Print, 1993, p.75) Figure 1: Walker’s Model (Print, 1993, p 75)

6. Application of the model to curriculum development  The model used for curriculum development is influenced generally by the level at which the development is occurring.  used at a macro level for curriculum development (national)  For example: Alberta, Canada “For Pan-Canadian or regional curriculum development the models used are often derived from the instrumental or communicative model, as frameworks and specific learning objectives are the key aim of these development activities, and consensus among partners is a desired outcome” (Alberta Education, 2012, p. 35).

7. - focuses on the subjective perceptions and views of the designers, the target group, and other stakeholders

8. Advantages One of the strengths of Walker’s model is the input of curriculum developers , target group, and other parties/stakeholders in the development of the curriculum. Stakeholder engagement in the planning and development stages empowers and acknowledges them, especially teachers, as valuable contributors.

9. One of the strengths of the deliberative model is the broad social support that the intended product will have; after all, users and other parties involved were given ample opportunity to contribute.

10. Disadvantages  Walker describes what happens in the process of curriculum design but does not describe what actually happens in the classroom.  The processes for deliberation can be time consuming and resource intensive, and can result in curriculum products that may not be consistent and aligned internally.  Consensus is often hard to achieve when developing curriculum at national or regional levels.

11. Model comparison

12. References  Alberta Education. (2012). Curriculum development processes, from knowledge to action. Retrieved from http://www.education.alberta.ca/media/6809242/d_chapt er1.pdf  Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Curriculum development: inductive model. Schooling, 2(1).  Print, M. (1993). Curriculum development and design, 2nd edn. Sydney, Allen & Unwin.  Walker, D. (1971). A naturalistic model for curriculum development, School Review, 80(1), 51-65.

13. Decker Walker's Naturalistic Model (1971) Introduction to Curriculum Theory and Practice 08.10.15 R. Noel and N. Robinson

 

Meet the Author


PC
Frank Abugri

Content writer

follow me

INTERSTING TOPICS


Connect and interact with amazing Authors in our twitter community